7.2     Quality Enhancement Plan 

The institution has a Quality Enhancement Plan that (a) has a topic identified through its ongoing, comprehensive planning and evaluation processes; (b) has broad-based support of institutional constituencies; (c) focuses on improving specific student learning outcomes and/or student success; (d) commits resources to initiate, implement and complete the QEP; and (e) includes a plan to assess achievement. (Quality Enhancement Plan)

Judgment

x   Compliance           o  Non-Compliance           o Partial Compliance

Narrative

The Quality Enhancement Plan for UL Lafayette, Advance: Student Research Experience, supports the strategic mission of the University to increase student productivity and success through engagement in mentored research, innovative projects, and creative endeavors. Advance creates the undergraduate research initiative described in the UL Lafayette 2015-2020 Strategic Plan, and creates a plan to move the University towards increasing “student productivity and success through engagement in mentored research, innovative projects, and creative endeavors.”

Through a lengthy process that garnered broad-base support from faculty, students, staff, and alumni, UL Lafayette selected Student Research as the University’s QEP topic. A QEP development committee with representatives from across the University narrowed the topic to undergraduate research and focused on enhancing course-based student research as a means to provide more students with research experiences and prepare more students for mentored research opportunities. The topic of Student Research aligns with the UL Lafayette 2015-2020 Strategic Plan, impacting three of the university’s strategic imperatives and key performance indicators related to students. Performance indicators call for improving students’ success through high-impact practices, developing a model for defined and structured co-curricular activities, and developing an undergraduate research initiative providing opportunities for students regardless of major. Advance adopts a coordinated undergraduate research program as an institution-wide high-impact practice that formalizes students’ ability to earn a research distinction (certificate) by undertaking a co-curricular research activity (presentation, publication, performance, etc.) that is appropriately disseminated.

The vision of Advance is that UL Lafayette undergraduates will have an opportunity to participate in a student research experience (SRE) that will foster competencies in critical thinking, information literacy, ethics, creativity, and communication. UL Lafayette defines an SRE as a sustained effort to apply subject knowledge, skills, and abilities to a project that is valued by the discipline. An SRE should culminate with a presentation, publication, performance, or other form of dissemination appropriate to the discipline.

In order to achieve this vision, Advance prioritizes three student-learning outcomes (SLOs):

SLO 1: Students will acquire and demonstrate knowledge, skills, and abilities to complete an SRE.

SLO 2: Students will recognize the value of research, scholarship, and creativity in developing and improving knowledge, and facilitating learning.

SLO 3: Students will demonstrate the skills necessary to articulate the results of an SRE in appropriate formats, venues, and delivery modes.

Structured, coordinated modifications to program curricula complemented by heightened library instruction for students will support faculty in the development of the research-based curriculum and creation of pathways leading to an undergraduate research designation in the academic programs. A Student Center for Research will be established to facilitate the development, coordination, and communication of research activities and opportunities within the academic programs. The Center will monitor and track completed SREs across all undergraduate programs.

Students electing to pursue undergraduate research will be supported through enhanced capabilities of the University’s Writing Center and through new focused activities.  These include presentation skills workshops, an undergraduate research conference, funding to attend national conferences, the creation of a student research journal, and the establishment of a research week to highlight the undergraduate research activities.

The University will use external and internal assessments to evaluate both SLOs and program goal progress. SLOs will be assessed through direct and indirect measures. Rubrics will be used to evaluate research artifacts created in research-intensive courses and student presentations. Perceptions of research experiences will be measured with the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), customized Student Evaluation of Instruction for research-intensive courses, and exit surveys for participating students.

The plan for the assessment includes both summative and formative evaluation activities to determine the level of student and faculty engagement in coordinated research activities, as well to gauge the effectiveness of project design and the extent to which the expected operational and student learning outcomes are attained. As programs re-design curricula to incorporate new research opportunities and formalize a pathway to earning the undergraduate research designation, assessment activities will be designed to allow for the collection of student artifacts leading to direct assessment of the research skills (including critical thinking, information literacy, ethics, creativity, and communication) they develop. Rubrics and/or rating sheets will generally provide data to analyze whether the level of skills and competencies students attain sufficiently prepare them to complete a meaningful SRE. Rubrics and other standard rating instruments will also be adopted to assess final student research projects against the expected learning outcomes and their associated sub-competencies. Faculty providing ratings for student artifacts and/or presentations will undergo calibration training to ensure consistent and equitable ratings for direct assessment instruments.

The significance of the research experiences students participate in extends beyond students earning of an undergraduate research distinction. These experiences underscore the University’s belief that students will recognize the value of research, scholarship, and creativity in developing and improving knowledge and facilitating learning. The expectation is that students will leverage the research experience to discover more about their discipline and themselves as scholars.